![]() ![]() ![]() Versioning helps manage content creation by individuals and groups.Data remains active and can be modified continually. It’s organized by folder, over different devices and with access by different people. File sync is designed for ubiquitous access to the same content - usually the most recent content.Sync-and-share, versioning, and endpoint backup solve different business problems, address different requirements, and are managed differently: However, they lack adequate data protection these tools, designed with backup as an afterthought, are more complex and create reliability problems when used in that role. ![]() In particular, file sync and share can’t replace endpoint backup today.ĭownload White Paper: How Third Parties Fill the Critical Gaps Left by Cloud ProvidersĪt first glance, file sync and share tools with versioning capabilities (such as Microsoft’s OneDrive for Business) appear to be “good enough” for backup, due to the tools’ innate data protection capabilities. Rather, fundamental design goal differences make them complementary technologies. Both have value, but they are not swappable replacements for one another. However, sync and share tools and enterprise backup tools differ at core, fundamental levels. These tools, created for different purposes, have overlapping but distinct functions. The emergence of file sync/share solutions has spurred a debate regarding whether a file sync/share service with versioning capabilities (such as Microsoft’s OneDrive for Business) can replace endpoint backup solutions (such as Druva inSync). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |